Check the spelling or try a shorter, more general word.
Try one of these
Search is unavailable right now. Please try again.
Search is not available for this device.
This happens after inappropriate or unsafe queries.
Search settings
When a query is in another language, the results come in that language. You can switch back in one click, and this setting remembers what you choose.
Your searches are linked to this device only. When the period ends, or if you delete them, the link to you is removed and only anonymous statistics remain.
Also deletes your AI assistant data — search and the assistant share one identity.
Enter — open · Esc — closeSpace or → completesnakordoni.eu
Passenger experience with ZUBUSTIK is sharply polarised. Satisfied travellers praise friendly, professional and attentive drivers, who explain transfers, joke with passengers and check the cabin after stops. They also cite comfortable, clean buses on some legs, easy ticket purchase and helpful support. Reviewers who had a smooth trip and a punctual departure tend to rate the carrier 4-5 and consider the fare fair for what it is.
The dominant complaints concern the transfer-based model. Many tickets are sold as direct or with a single possible change, yet passengers end up with two or more transfers and waits of 4-6 hours, mainly in Ternopil. Delays of 1-11 hours are common. Several people describe missed or cancelled departures, buses leaving early, platform or bus changes that were not communicated, and passengers left in cities such as Warsaw or on the road after breakdowns. Refund requests are reportedly refused and hotline support is described as dismissive, though some praise the support service.
Vehicle quality is inconsistent. Some buses are described as old, dirty, smelly and in poor technical condition, with no toilet, no charging sockets, weak or absent air conditioning in summer heat, or an overly cold cabin at night. Other passengers note a low-hanging TV on the upper deck, cramped legroom, and short 10-minute stops that are hard on elderly travellers. WiFi is not mentioned. Price-to-quality is judged acceptable by some but poor by those hit by delays and unannounced changes.
Pros
Friendly, professional and attentive drivers
Comfortable, clean buses on some legs and routes
Clear explanations of transfers on some trips
Easy ticket purchase and helpful support for some
Affordable fares and some direct service on hard-to-reach routes
Cons
Undisclosed or extra transfers and long waits, especially in Ternopil
Frequent delays of several hours, plus missed or early-departing trips
Poor communication about bus or platform changes; refunds refused
Old, dirty buses, sometimes with no toilet, no charging sockets or weak AC
Short stops, uncomfortable temperature and rude behaviour from some drivers
Highlights
Most complaints involve multi-leg routes via Ternopil and Lviv, including Poland/Slovakia to Ukraine services
Reviews from the last two months skew negative, mostly over transfer disruption
Praise centres on drivers and on smooth trips with on-time departure
Analysis is based on 50+ reviews from various sources.
№ 02
Rating Details
Staff
80%
Vehicle
80%
Price
60%
Timeliness
0%
Cleanliness
0%
Wi-Fi
0%
Seating Space
0%
XL
100%
Standard
0%
S
Additional Comfort
Air Conditioning
Power Outlets
Toilet
Entertainment (without Wi-Fi)
Drink
№ 03
Customer Reviews
Марко
Тернопіль → Краків
14.01.2026
Vehicle: Staff: Price:
Користувався послугами перевізника Стецик Т.В., квитки купував через сайт https://zubustik.ua/
Автобус у хорошому стані, салон чистий і комфортний, водії ввічливі та професійні.
Ціни, можливо, трохи вищі, але взимку вони зростають майже у всіх перевізників, тому нічого критичного в цьому не бачу. Перевізник супер!