Carrier · profile

Віп-Тревел

3.6 Overall rating
50 reviews
1,293 views
Rating aggregated from 50 reviews
🛂 Official registry data (DSBT)
ДАВИДЮК АННА МИКОЛАЇВНА
EDRPOU: 3099618289  ·  Licence: Наказом Укртрансбезпеки № 482 від 08.07.2021   Valid
Director: ДАВИДЮК АННА МИКОЛАЇВНА
ЖУЧЕНКО ЯНА ВІКТОРІВНА
EDRPOU: 3205617465  ·  Licence: Наказом Укртрансбезпеки № 793 від 14.05.2025   Valid
Director: ЖУЧЕНКО ЯНА ВІКТОРІВНА
№ 01

Review Analysis

Passengers describe a carrier that is reliable and pleasant on a good day but inconsistent on a bad one. Many reviewers thank drivers for being friendly, fast and professional, and praise smooth, on-time trips with comfortable seating and working climate control. However, a recurring and serious complaint is that the vehicle shown at the stop does not match what was booked: several riders paid for a comfortable coach and instead received an old, dirty, or overcrowded minibus (маршрутка), sometimes with a leaking roof or broken air conditioning. Legroom is a frequent sore point, especially on back-row seats where five seats are advertised but do not comfortably fit five people. Climate control swings both ways — passengers report sweltering, poorly ventilated buses in summer and cold, drafty ones in winter. Toilet stops are described as rare and hard to negotiate on longer routes. A distinct cluster of complaints concerns undisclosed transfers: tickets and the website often fail to mention a connection (commonly through Dnipro or Kharkiv), leaving passengers to wait 30–120 minutes for a second vehicle, sometimes in the cold or with luggage in hand. Departure times also don't always match what's printed on the ticket. Price-to-quality perception is mixed: many feel it's fair or a bargain, but a meaningful minority feel overcharged given the downgraded vehicle or delays they experienced, and a couple of reviewers reported unresponsive customer service when seeking refunds.

Pros

  • Friendly, skilled, and fast drivers frequently praised by name-less mentions
  • Generally punctual departures and arrivals when no substitution occurs
  • Good value/comfort ratio on well-served, direct routes
  • Operators proactively call to notify passengers of schedule or pickup-point changes

Cons

  • Vehicle substitution: booked 'comfortable coach' replaced by an old, cramped, or dirty minibus
  • Undisclosed transfers/connections (often via Dnipro or Kharkiv) not shown on ticket or website, causing long waits
  • Cramped legroom and poorly designed back-row seating, especially on longer trips
  • Inconsistent climate control — overheating in summer, cold drafts in winter
  • Departure time mismatches between ticket/website and actual pickup, plus weak refund/support responsiveness

Highlights

  • Routes connecting through Dnipro or Kharkiv show the highest concentration of undisclosed-transfer complaints
  • Zaporizhzhia–Kryvyi Rih/Kamianske corridor drew multiple reports of vehicle downgrades and overcrowding
  • Short, purely positive one-line reviews ('дякую', 'все добре') dominate the recent months, suggesting routine trips go largely uneventful
Analysis is based on 50+ reviews from various sources.

Carrier fleet

4 licence plates we have on record for Віп-Тревел.

  • AB9938KB on record
  • BM0150EH on record
  • BM8122BI on record
  • IDEABUS on record

Plates are compiled from border-crossing data and public sources; the list may be incomplete.

How long did the bus wait at the border?

Pick a carrier, then choose a specific bus plate to see where and how long it recently spent crossing the border.

Select or type the plate above to load its border history.

№ 02

Customer Reviews

Traveled with Віп-Тревел?

Be the first to leave a review!

Updated