Feedback on this carrier is very limited, based on only two third-party reviews, and both lean negative, so conclusions should be treated with caution. The main theme is reliability and trust. One passenger questions whether minibus route No. 400 still operates at all, saying the information available online is outdated and the vehicle failed to appear at stops on three separate occasions. This suggests that published schedules are poorly maintained and passengers cannot plan trips with confidence.
The second review describes a conflict with a driver at a terminal stop early in the morning. A passenger who presented a veteran's ID was reportedly told repeatedly to pay the fare or leave the vehicle, without discussion. The passenger tried to photograph the driver and look for contact details for complaints, noting that fare notices are posted inside the minibus. This points to a rigid fare-enforcement approach and a perceived lack of courtesy from staff, as well as unclear handling of concession entitlements.
No reviewer commented on vehicle condition, cleanliness, air conditioning, WiFi, toilets or onboard amenities, so these aspects cannot be assessed. Price-to-quality ratings were low to middling, reflecting dissatisfaction with service and reliability rather than the fare level itself. Overall, passengers report unreliable service and poor staff interaction, with no positives clearly described.
Be the first to leave a review!
Updated