Opticargo UAB drivers report predominantly negative experiences with serious integrity and wage concerns. While the company initially offered flexibility with contracts ranging from 6 months to indefinite terms and one driver praised timely salary payments by the 10th, major issues emerged quickly. The most critical complaints involve fraudulent fuel deduction practices (ecoball/fuel consumption tracking), where drivers are charged for fuel consumption that doesn't match actual salary deductions—creating systematic underpayment. Severe wage discrimination is alleged, with foreign workers earning as little as 650 EUR for two months while Lithuanian employees earn 1,300 EUR monthly for identical work. Management reportedly lacks knowledge of labor regulations and dismisses driver complaints. Most damaging, after the company lost four lawsuits requiring approximately 31,000 EUR in compensation, management allegedly attempted to recoup these losses directly from working drivers' wages. Working conditions intensified correspondingly, with driving hours increasing from initially reasonable 40-45 hours weekly.
Pros
Flexible contract terms (6 months to indefinite agreements possible)
Timely salary payments (consistently by 10th of month)
Reasonable base pay rates when honestly calculated (80-85 EUR mentioned)
Initially moderate driving schedules (40-45 hours per week)
Small company size allowing direct negotiations
Cons
Systematic fraudulent ecoball/fuel deduction discrepancies between charges and actual deductions
Extreme wage discrimination between foreign and local workers (650 EUR vs 1,300 EUR for same work)
Management attempted to recoup legal settlement costs (31,000 EUR) through driver wage deductions
Management lacks knowledge of labor law and rest regulations, dismissive responses to complaints
Escalating work pressure and intensified driving schedules following company financial losses
User Reviews (0)
Be the first to leave a review!
AI analysis is based on 6+ reviews from various sources.
Lithuania