Areisa UAB presents a deeply divided employment experience with stark disparities between experienced and inexperienced drivers. Experienced drivers with 2-6+ years tenure report positive conditions including access to newer vehicles, competitive wages for dedicated workers, and long-term employment stability. However, inexperienced drivers face systematically lower compensation compared to industry standards and inadequate management support. Multiple drivers consistently report payment fraud and wage deception, with compensation appearing below market rates. A critical concern involves double charging for damages: workers face paycheck deductions during employment followed by lawsuits post-termination. Equipment quality varies dramatically - newer vehicles exist alongside deteriorated trucks, yet drivers claim responsibility for road repairs that should be handled by service centers. Management communication appears deficient, with unsupportive responses to legitimate maintenance requests. The company functions as an entry point for inexperienced drivers but systematically exploits this inexperience through reduced wages, aggressive billing practices, and harsh treatment.
Pros
Newer vehicles available for experienced drivers
Competitive wages for dedicated, long-term workers
Long-term employment stability (6+ year tenure possible)
Entry-level employment opportunity for inexperienced drivers
Cons
Systematically lower salaries compared to industry standards
Widespread payment fraud and wage deception practices
Poor equipment maintenance with drivers forced to perform repairs
Double charging for damages (paycheck deductions plus post-termination lawsuits)
Hostile management toward inexperienced drivers with inadequate support
User Reviews (0)
Be the first to leave a review!
AI analysis is based on 7+ reviews from various sources.
Lithuania