Norlida UAB exhibits deeply polarized driver experiences with conflicting testimonies about workplace standards. While one experienced driver reports four consecutive employment periods with reliable salary disbursement 'down to the kopeck' and on-time advances, six other drivers describe systemic exploitation and non-payment. Multiple Ukrainian migrant workers allege brutal treatment, arbitrary wage deductions, and salary decisions based on manager favoritism rather than objective criteria. Accusations extend beyond individual grievances to alleged fraud schemes referenced in YouTube content ('Viking Lithuania' channel). Payment reliability emerges as the most contested issue, with reports ranging from punctual full disbursement to complete non-payment without explanation. Management transparency and fairness are severely questioned, with drivers reporting discriminatory treatment of foreign workers, exploitation tactics, and lack of clear wage policies. The company faces serious reputation damage from cumulative accounts of financial misconduct.
Pros
Reliable salary payment when employed (claimed by at least one long-term driver)
On-time advance wage payments
No arbitrary deductions for compliant workers
Available long-term employment opportunity
Cons
Systematic non-payment and wage withholding
Exploitation of Ukrainian and migrant drivers
Brutal and disrespectful management treatment
Arbitrary salary decisions based on manager favoritism
Discriminatory treatment of foreign workers
Alleged fraud and financial misconduct documented online
Lack of transparent wage policies
User Reviews (0)
Be the first to leave a review!
AI analysis is based on 7+ reviews from various sources.