JORDĖ experiences mixed driver feedback regarding working conditions and management practices. While some drivers report stable, long-term employment with acceptable conditions, others raise concerns about a strict deduction and fine system, including fuel consumption norms, eco-driving requirements, and unjustified driver fund deductions. The company, a relatively small Lithuanian firm with under 100 vehicles, appears professionally structured, but management communication and accountability practices are disputed. One experienced driver defends the company, challenging claims of excessive fines as exaggerated or generic critiques. Key workplace tensions center on driver accountability for issues, eco-driving monitoring enforcement, and fuel efficiency quotas. Payment reliability and equipment quality are not explicitly discussed in available reviews.
Pros
Professionally organized company structure
Stable long-term employment opportunity
Clear operational standards and requirements
Cons
System of deductions and fines perceived as excessive
Strict fuel consumption quotas and monitoring
Eco-driving monitoring requirements
Management perceived as having internal conflicts
Drivers blamed for organizational problems
User Reviews (0)
Be the first to leave a review!
AI analysis is based on 6+ reviews from various sources.
Lithuania
